Modulation of high-density lipoproteins in a population in istanbul, Turkey, with low levels of high-density lipoproteins.

The extent to which high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels can be increased in patients with low HDL cholesterol is important because low HDL cholesterol levels increase the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). During the past 14 years, we have assessed risk factors in Turks, a population in which extremely low HDL cholesterol levels (mean 36 mg/dl in men, 42 mg/dl in women) are a prime CHD risk factor. Although genetically determined to a significant extent, these low HDL cholesterol levels can be modulated by lifestyle factors, as in other populations. We measured the HDL cholesterol levels in men and women residing in Istanbul at 3 time points: 1990 to 1993, 1996 to 2000, and 2003. The mean HDL cholesterol levels increased from 45.3 +/- 9.5 mg/dl in 1990 to 1993 to 49.7 +/- 12 mg/dl in 2003 (p <0.0001) in women, but were virtually unchanged in men (38 +/- 8 vs 39 +/- 10 mg/dl). In contrast to previous years, the HDL cholesterol levels in women in 2003 were markedly affected by education level and socioeconomic status, averaging 56 +/- 9 mg/dl in those with a university education and 48 +/- 12 mg/dl in those with a primary school education. Part of this difference could be explained by less smoking and more exercise and lower body mass index (average 25.6 +/- 4.9 vs 29.7 +/- 5.1 kg/m(2)) of the highly educated women. It is important to note the increase in the prevalence of obesity between the 1990 to 1993 interval and 2003 in men and women, including a remarkable change from 9.4% to 45.2% among women with a primary school education. None of these factors affected the HDL cholesterol levels of men by >2 mg/dl at any of the 3 points. In conclusion, because CHD risk changes by as much as 2% to 4% per 1 mg/dl difference in HDL cholesterol level, the 8 mg/dl difference may reflect as much as a 20% to 30% reduction in CHD risk associated with the benefit of higher education in women. Why education failed to affect the HDL cholesterol levels in Turkish men remains unclear.

Risk determination of dyslipidemia in populations characterized by low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for managing dyslipidemia qualify patients for treatment based on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and other risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). However, when LDL-C is the sole lipid criterion for initiating therapy, patients with levels below the treatment initiation threshold who are at high risk because of low levels (<40 mg/dL) of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) might not be identified. Twenty percent of male patients with CHD in the United States fall into this category. The total cholesterol/HDL-C (TC/HDL-C) ratio predicts CHD risk regardless of the absolute LDL-C and HDL-C. METHODS: We compared guidelines based on TC/HDL-C and LDL-C with those recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III). Both sets of guidelines were applied to 9837 adults (>20 years of age) in the Turkish Heart Study, which has shown that 75% of men and 50% of women in Turkey have HDL-C <40 mg/dL. RESULTS: ATP III guidelines identified 14% of Turkish adults, 20 years or older, as candidates for lifestyle treatment only and an additional 18% for drug treatment. In conjunction with ATP III LDL-C thresholds, the TC/HDL-C ratio (>3.5, patients with CHD; > or =6.0, 2+ risk factors, > or =7.0, 0 to 1 risk factor) assigned lifestyle therapy alone to 18% and drug treatment to an additional 36%. Among primary prevention subjects at high risk because of age (men > or =45 years; women > or =55 years), both sets of guidelines prescribed lifestyle therapy for only 5%; however, drug treatment was recommended for an additional 13% by ATP III guidelines and an additional 18% by TC/HDL-C and LDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: In populations at risk for CHD caused by low HDL-C, qualification of subjects for treatment based on either the TC/HDL-C ratio or LDL-C thresholds identifies more high-risk subjects for treatment than LDL-C threshold values alone, and use of the ratio, instead of risk tables, simplifies the approach for physicians.